Confusion between xmpDM fields and dc fields.


greetings,
have not read specification while, , seems there have been 2 new releases since time, confused newly added dynamic management section schema, importantly following
fields confuse me:

xmpdm:artist
xmpdm:album
xmpdm:genre

i don't understand why these specific fields exist, because not equivalent dublincore schema, no??

more
xmpdm:artist -> dc:creator (ok, admit bit far-fetched but..)
xmpdm:album -> dc:source (according iso 15836, resource derived from, album name should there, no?)
xmpdm:genre -> dc:type (according iso 15836, genre of resource).

so rule, should update xmp metadata in both dc , xmpdm schema if describe audio resource?

thanks , pointers on topic!

carl eric codere

i don't think there's requirement implementing new schema needs alias existing fields. that's useful in custom, narrowly focused schema it's confusing. private schemas consistently named , self contained. i'm guessing that's case here adobe video tool engineers: "this schema specifies properties used adobe dymanic media group."


More discussions in XMP SDK


adobe

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

arduino bug sur secteur, batterie, mais pas en usb?

Static ip - Raspberry Pi Forums

What voltage is sent to the arduino GND when a transistor is used